In chapter 7 we are led through a helpful overview of time before, during, and after David, and what constitutes a faithful shepherd. I found helpful the comment on pg.102, following a discussion of David & Uzzah’s death, “…this passage reports a magnificent promise made to David and his lineage. God will bless David, but on God’s terms. David needed to learn “meticulous obedience� to God’s word.
But not yet. Still there is Bathsheba, and Uriah. Still we have Nathan, “…the prophet (who) succeeds in revealing just how far David had come from being the shepherd of God’s people: rather than protecting them on the battlefield, he was at home sacrificing them for his personal pleasure.� (pg 104)
So, for David, there is forgiveness, albeit with consequence. Still, in the end, he is portrayed as one who is “after God’s heart�, with his favorite son on the throne, and all well (well, at least according to the Chronicler and others who portray the ideal shepherd).
What is the role of forgiveness/consequence for today’s under-shepherds? When shepherd-pastors, who devote years to God’s people, who speak the Word in season and out of season, who are compassionate and nurturing fall into temptation, their ministries are thwarted. In my Lutheran tradition they may even be removed from the Clergy roster, unable to serve, even if such a transgression occurred way in the past.
In light of what some of my compatriots are going through, it seems like David got of easy. His unborn son (and, of course Bathsheba, Uriah, Tamar, Israelites…) bear the burden of David’s sin.
And yet, in this Christian Community, forgiveness is key. Where is the fine line for shepherds and leaders when it comes to consequences in the light of the awesome forgiving gift of Christ?
ShepherdLeader.com
A safe place for shepherds to reflect together.